We current study information because of these two clinics in addition to from lesbian…

London’s two lesbian intimate wellness clinics had been founded by a physician involved in genitourinary solutions who’d seen that lesbians and bisexual ladies are not well served by current solutions. The clinic that is first the Sandra Bernhard, ended up being created in 1992 at Charing Cross Hospital in west London. 3 The need for appointments only at that hospital resulted in the opening of an extra in 1993, the Audre Lorde at the Royal London Hospital in eastern London. These clinics were emerge genitourinary departments with feminine staff, providing health that is sexual to lesbians and bisexual ladies.

We survey that is present because of these two clinics along with from lesbian and bisexual women’s community teams and snowball connections throughout the great britain. This information that is detailed the intimate records and techniques of more than 1000 lesbians and bisexual females is supposed to see people who offer medical care or carry away research with women that might be intimately active with other ladies.


Within the duration 1992–5 a numbered questionnaire for self conclusion ended up being agreed to brand new clients attending either the Bernhard or perhaps the Audre Lorde lesbian intimate wellness clinics in London (clinic sample n=803). Besides the hospital test, a residential district test had been purposively chosen 12 to incorporate people who had been diverse with regards to geography, competition, class, and impairment. Groups or organisations had been identified through listings into the lesbian and press that is homosexual participants had been recruited from across England and Scotland by dispersing a questionnaire after focus team sessions concerning basic or intimate health insurance and at conferences (n=415). 3 A snowballing method 12 was used to disseminate further questionnaires to connections of this focus team attenders.

All feminine participants who reported previous or present intercourse with females had been included along with women who provided no reputation for exact exact same intercourse sexual intercourse, but whom defined their intimate orientation as lesbian, bisexual, homosexual, dyke, khush, or zami. People who described on their own as heterosexual, without any past reputation for sexual intercourse with ladies, had been excluded through the research.

The questionnaire collected demographic information, sexual history with both women and men, and intimate practice with feminine lovers. In addition, all of the community test were expected questions regarding sexual training with males and safer intercourse (n=328).

Information had been entered into a analytical analysis package ( spss variation 10) and analysed utilizing easy proportions, correlation coefficients, and П‡ 2 tests of importance.


Precise response prices are as yet not known; questionnaires had been wanted to about 1000 brand brand new attenders to your two London intimate health clinics; 803 center reactions had been gotten and analysed. In every, 1136 questionnaires were provided to community teams (several of that might n’t have been distributed); 415 of those had been received and analysed.

Reaction prices to specific concerns diverse; there is a response that is good demographic questions (96.2–99.8%), by having a poorer reaction to concerns handling rectal intercourse (77.2–79.7%). Where concerns had been expected just of this grouped community subgroup, this really is suggested into the results.

Description of test

Dining dining Table 1 shows demographic top features of the test.

Eighty eight per cent of participants categorised by themselves as white (white British, Irish, European, white other), 4% black colored (black colored Caribbean, black colored African, black colored Uk, black colored other), 2% Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, Asian British), and 5% “other.”

Ninety % associated with the sample that is whole on their own in listed here terms: lesbian, homosexual, dyke, khush, or zami. Eight per cent identified by themselves as bisexual and 2% “other” sexual orientation.

Eighty two percent (887/1085) of lesbians had a brief history of intercourse with males, 5% inside the year that is past. Practically all (98/101, 97%) bisexual ladies had a history of sex with males, 50% in the previous 12 months. Females aged 30 and underneath had been more prone to explain on their own as bisexual (63/567, 11%) compared to those over three decades old (39/625, 6%) (p treat this table: life partnerships that are sexual men and women

The amount of feminine partners that are sexual perhaps maybe not correlate with wide range of male intimate lovers (correlation coefficient 0.094); as an example, ladies with a brief history of larger variety of male lovers try not to likewise have a reputation for bigger amounts of feminine lovers, and vice versa.

Dining dining Table 3 shows the regularity of various practices that are sexual gents and ladies.

Maternity history

Twenty six percent reported a history of maternity; 13.5percent reported a number of real time births, 0.3% reported stillbirths, 5.8% had miscarried, and 13.5% had undergone termination of being pregnant. There clearly was no difference between pregnancy rates by sexual identification; 26% (274/1069) of lesbians was indeed pregnant in contrast to 29% (29/99) of bisexual females (p=0.27).

Usage of obstacles in sex (safer sex)

Three hundred and twenty eight females had been expected questions regarding safer intercourse with people within the previous 10 years.

Eighty six per cent of these whom reported sex that is oral women (n=296) had never ever utilized dental dams; 13% utilized them occasionally or usually and 1% constantly utilized them. Of these whom reported sex that is sharing with ladies (n=127), 22% never washed them before sharing, 31% washed them sometimes or usually, with 47% always washing them. In addition, 22% of these sex that is sharing utilized condoms occasionally or usually whenever sharing, and 26% constantly did.

Of these whom reported penetrative intercourse with guys (penis-vagina) (n=170), 32% had never ever utilized condoms or femidoms, 45% utilized them sporadically or frequently, and 23% constantly did. Of these whom reported penetration that is anal a penis (n=35), 42% had never utilized a condom or femidom, 29% utilized them sometimes or frequently, and 29% constantly did. For the 128 ladies who reported sex that is oral males, 80% never ever utilized condoms, 16% periodically or frequently, and 4% constantly utilized them.


Intimate orientation may be defined by intimate identification, intimate attraction, or intimate behaviour. 13 These definitions are not always congruent, and they are very likely to vary in level and in the long run. We selected topics on such basis as both intimate identification and behaviour that is sexual. We utilized convenience sampling (chosen by virtue of attendance at lesbian clinics or through lesbian and bisexual women’s community teams) since lesbian and bisexual orientation that is sexual stigmatised and topics difficult to take research. 14 The clinics were advertised as lesbian soulcams health that is sexual, while the study referred to as a study of lesbian intimate wellness, therefore bisexual women can be apt to be under-represented. Even though the community test had been purposively selected to mirror demographic diversity, the outcome presented is almost certainly not straight generalisable to lesbians and bisexual ladies in other settings. These information aren’t designed to express all lesbians and bisexual females, but rather to spell it out variety of sexual history and training in a large test of females who’ve intercourse with females.